Best wishes,
Sylvia
Best wishes,
Sylvia
That’s really interesting. I have a reasonable sample so I’ll do a bit more microscopy and see where that gets me.
Sylvia
Not a lichen I’m going to come across in Sussex any time soon, but I think a new record for Appleby St Lawrence churchyard. Interesting about the UV result. I only had tiny amounts of thallus to work with as it was from a churchyard headstone, but definitely orangey tinge.
Best wishes,
Sylvia
Best wishes,
Sylvia
Really interesting post, thank you. With regard to registering, a keen lichenologist I know here in Sussex registered on here (used the button top left, next to login button), but for a long time he just couldn’t login even though everything seemed to have gone smoothly with the registration procedure. He couldn’t find any contact on the forum to ask for help, but he kept on trying to login every so often and then it all just worked and he can now login. Not sure what’s going on there.
Also I would be keen to come up to Bedford, if you do something in that area.
All the best
Sylvia
Just done the tests and indeed it is UV orange/pink, K/UV wet bright yellow/green, and KC orange – fantastic – so Traponora varians has hopped over the border from Hampshire to Sussex.
One trip to Iping Common has now yielded Hypotrachyna lividescens and Traponora varians – more trips are definitely needed.
Cheers,
Sylvia
All the best,
Sylvia
Sylvia
This is the second time I’ve found it, but the first time it was on sandstone and it looked just like it does on bark. Not the case for flint, where it will be very easily overlooked as the thallus was so thin and barely there, as well as being the same colour as flint. Perhaps Cresponea premnea will turn up next!
Thanks,
Sylvia
I find B calciseda in every churchyard and it seems to be more common than B baldensis in the churchyards I’ve done so far. It’s really interesting to see the two lists of what you expect to find.
Best wishes,
Sylvia
Best wishes,
Sylvia
I had to go back and get some more sample of the potential V romeana, hence the delay, and I have also found a thallus at another church, which seems to be a possible V romeana (keys out in LGBI3). I’ve attached photos below of the epinecral layer from both samples – both have epinecral layers that are at the thickest 9 micrometers and in many places absent. This seems to fit the bill for V romeana, rather than V. macrostoma.
Thanks,
Sylvia
The churchyard also contained Thelidium incavatum and Thelidium decipiens on a nearby limestone tomb, so almost the ‘quad’. I feel I need to have a look for the fourth one now! 
Best wishes,
Sylvia
I also have a couple of samples from a while ago, when I was just starting microscopy that I put aside as mysteries, that I now think are this lichen. Nice to be able to solve those mysteries as well.
Thanks,
Sylvia
