Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Richard Shotbolt kindly offered to do examine these. I’ve have attached his pictures. His comment accompanying the first was
‘Basidia and a possible spore’
and the second
‘I’ve examined this now but there are very few pictures available to compare the microscopic details. There are certainly oli-filled gloiocystidia and densely-interwoven hyphae. I could not find anything that looked definitely like a spore; the basidia were all barren although the four sterigmata were easily visible. Hoping some expert can tell us whether this looks OK.’
Is anyone able to confirm this idenfication?
Phil
[attachment=1]clav2.jpg[/attachment] [attachment=0]clav1.jpg[/attachment] Many thanks for your help Roy – the smell was ‘mushroomy’ I’ll try to get a better look at and a better photo of the ring
Hi Chris, In answer to your question
“why is this on the General fungi discussion thread and not the Fungi ID requests one?”
It wasn’t originally a request for identification. In my original post I mentioned I had found Arrhenia sphagnicola (although admittedly I have become less confident of this)
and
“NBN suggest’s it’s pretty rare here. I’m a bit of fungus novice so I’m not really sure about recording – is this the kind of thing I should inform the county recorder of?”
Surely that’s General Discussion?
..if not then apologies
Cheers,
Phil
Many thanks for you help Chris, Which are the possible confusion species?
This is probably be the naivety of a novice (although I understand how examination of macroscopic characters alone is often insufficient)…
…. however I haven’t seen anything that this could be confused with
The other two members of the genus Clavicorona mairei, Clavicorona pyxidata (or are there others??) look rather different as do the members of the superficially similar genera you’ve mentioned.
By the way there were quite a number (maybe 30) of examples I found which looked (almost) identical the one in the photo
Cheers,
Phil
p.s I have now found someone who will do the microscopy
ah yes thanks very much Thanks for the info Christine This is going to sound slightly pathetic, but I’ve been unable to find out the details of the relevant recorder
– I’m in South Lancs (vc59)- is anyone able to help
Cheers,
Phil
yes, I think light ochre might describe the color – however I’m finding I’m making ID mistakes, because the book description of spore colours, doesn’t match the way I’d describe it – notably ‘pink’ in the case of entoloma and pluteus. – the fault is clearly mine though – not the book!
ah yes, thank you – although should f.tubaria have spores that colour? Hi Chris, I had initially rejected A. Sphagnicola, myself, as mine didnt seem to show the scales.
However I’ve seen several photos of A. Sphagnicola, where scales aren’t evident
The photos arent brilliant but I’ve attached them
Cheers,
Phil
[attachment=2]fa41.jpg[/attachment] [attachment=1]fa11.jpg[/attachment] [attachment=0]fa31.jpg[/attachment] November 9, 2015 at 11:38 am in reply to: Fungus Of The Day (One identified fungus only please, with species name in attachment comment and in post) #33589Many thanks for the info, It doesnt appear to be on either database for Lancs
Cheers,
Phil
Many thanks Chris, Entoloma conferendum seems to pretty much fit the bill
I’ve made mistake before with Pluteus – rejecting a whole genus, which turned out to be the right one, because the spore print wasn’t, to my eyes, pink.
I think I must be colour blind – or maybe just pink-blind
Cheers,
Phil
-
AuthorPosts











