Forum Replies Created

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Clavicorona taxophila? #37398

    Richard Shotbolt kindly offered to do examine these.

    I’ve have attached his pictures. His comment accompanying the first was

    ‘Basidia and a possible spore’

    and the second

    ‘I’ve examined this now but there are very few pictures available to compare the microscopic details. There are certainly oli-filled gloiocystidia and densely-interwoven hyphae. I could not find anything that looked definitely like a spore; the basidia were all barren although the four sterigmata were easily visible. Hoping some expert can tell us whether this looks OK.’

    Is anyone able to confirm this idenfication?

    Phil

    clav2.jpg

    [attachment=1]clav2.jpg[/attachment]

    clav1.jpg

    [attachment=0]clav1.jpg[/attachment]

    in reply to: Agaricus? #37446

    I found a younger specimen – this one showing the ring

    Does this help to narrow it down?

    Cheers

    Phil

    ag10.jpg

    [attachment=2]ag10.jpg[/attachment]

    ag11.jpg

    [attachment=1]ag11.jpg[/attachment]

    ag13.jpg

    [attachment=0]ag13.jpg[/attachment]

    in reply to: Agaricus? #37445

    Many thanks for your help Roy – the smell was ‘mushroomy’

    I’ll try to get a better look at and a better photo of the ring

    in reply to: Arrhenia sphagnicola #37302

    Hi Chris,

    In answer to your question

    “why is this on the General fungi discussion thread and not the Fungi ID requests one?”

    It wasn’t originally a request for identification. In my original post I mentioned I had found Arrhenia sphagnicola (although admittedly I have become less confident of this)

    and

    “NBN suggest’s it’s pretty rare here. I’m a bit of fungus novice so I’m not really sure about recording – is this the kind of thing I should inform the county recorder of?”

    Surely that’s General Discussion?

    ..if not then apologies

    Cheers,

    Phil

    in reply to: Clavicorona taxophila? #37397

    Many thanks for you help Chris,

    Which are the possible confusion species?

    This is probably be the naivety of a novice (although I understand how examination of macroscopic characters alone is often insufficient)…

    …. however I haven’t seen anything that this could be confused with

    The other two members of the genus Clavicorona mairei, Clavicorona pyxidata (or are there others??) look rather different as do the members of the superficially similar genera you’ve mentioned.

    By the way there were quite a number (maybe 30) of examples I found which looked (almost) identical the one in the photo

    Cheers,

    Phil

    p.s I have now found someone who will do the microscopy

    in reply to: How to upload images – "File too large" message. #37034

    This looks a lot like Clavicorona taxophila which is rare, can anyone confirm.

    Height 17mm, growing amongst debris on floor of mixed woodland, south lancs

    Thanks,

    Phil

    clav3b.jpg

    [attachment=2]clav3b.jpg[/attachment]

    clav2b.jpg

    [attachment=1]clav2b.jpg[/attachment]

    clavb.jpg

    [attachment=0]clavb.jpg[/attachment]

    in reply to: Hydnellum sp? #37395

    ah yes thanks very much

    in reply to: Arrhenia sphagnicola #37300

    Thanks for the info Christine

    This is going to sound slightly pathetic, but I’ve been unable to find out the details of the relevant recorder

    – I’m in South Lancs (vc59)- is anyone able to help

    Cheers,

    Phil

    in reply to: off white sp, decurrent gills #37324

    yes, I think light ochre might describe the color – however I’m finding I’m making ID mistakes, because the book description of spore colours, doesn’t match the way I’d describe it – notably ‘pink’ in the case of entoloma and pluteus.

    – the fault is clearly mine though – not the book!

    in reply to: off white sp, decurrent gills #37321

    ah yes, thank you – although should f.tubaria have spores that colour?

    in reply to: Arrhenia sphagnicola #37298

    Hi Chris,

    I had initially rejected A. Sphagnicola, myself, as mine didnt seem to show the scales.

    However I’ve seen several photos of A. Sphagnicola, where scales aren’t evident

    The photos arent brilliant but I’ve attached them

    Cheers,

    Phil

    fa41.jpg

    [attachment=2]fa41.jpg[/attachment]

    fa11.jpg

    [attachment=1]fa11.jpg[/attachment]

    fa31.jpg

    [attachment=0]fa31.jpg[/attachment]

    Bleeding Oak Crust – Stereum gausapatum – I think

    rug3.JPG

    [attachment=0]rug3.JPG[/attachment]

    in reply to: Arrhenia sphagnicola #37296

    Many thanks for the info,

    It doesnt appear to be on either database for Lancs

    Cheers,

    Phil

    in reply to: A Conocybe? #37294

    Many thanks Chris,

    Entoloma conferendum seems to pretty much fit the bill

    I’ve made mistake before with Pluteus – rejecting a whole genus, which turned out to be the right one, because the spore print wasn’t, to my eyes, pink.

    I think I must be colour blind – or maybe just pink-blind

    Cheers,

    Phil

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
Scroll to Top