Interesting, I’m going to Lichenodiplis poeltii following the key from Tsurykau & Etayo (2017) 10.1017/S0024282916000530. This was described from Australia and is still known only from the type locality (the protologue attached).
[attachment=0]Lichenodiplis poeltii 2.jpg
Two surprise finds from old photos!
Despite investigating every possible black dot on Arthonia radiata thallii on that twig other than host pycnidia (which seem to be fairly frequent) there was nothing further.
I’ll be there again in a couple weeks time and will bring more twigs back with me to check!
I didn’t find any mature asci, only what I took to be unsuccessful ones shown in the fourth image, so frustratingly I doubt there’s much hope of getting any further with this!
Photograph below shows where both the first and second group of micrographs were from (the second with both spores and macroconidia).
[attachment=0]zz Anisomeridium viridescens Q 240719 008.jpg
The lack of an obvious K+ green reaction in my first section concerned me so I was relieved to find both perithecia and pycnidia in the second section as macroconidia aren’t mentioned for Arthopyrenia carneobrunneola.
I checked the LGBI3 descriptions for both Anisomeridium viridescens and Arthopyrenia carneobrunneola and though the K reaction and presence/absence of pycnidia are the most obvious differences there is also a slight difference in the spore shape:
A. viridescens “usually constricted at the septum; the upper cell usually distinctly wider than the lower”
A. carneobrunneola “not or only slightly constricted at the median or somewhat supramedian septum”
Though some of the spores in my sections are a bit intermediate they do compare better with Mark Powells’s illustration of Anisomeridium viridescens here:
than with the Asco France photographs of Arthopyrenia carneobrunneola here:
Jenny
[attachment=2]w Anisomeridium viridescens 2 240719-10b.jpg
Macroconidia
[attachment=1]w Anisomeridium viridescens 2 240719-4 con.jpg
[attachment=0]w Anisomeridium viridescens 2 240719-3 con.jpg
