Fungus Of The Day (One identified fungus only please, with species name in attachment comment and in post)

Forums › Forums › General fungi discussion › Fungus Of The Day (One identified fungus only please, with species name in attachment comment and in post)

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 960 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #33372
    Lancashire Lad
    Moderator

      Marasmius rotula – Collared Parachute: –

      Click on image to view at full size.

      Marasmius rotula - Collared Parachute.jpg

      [attachment=0]Marasmius rotula – Collared Parachute.jpg[/attachment]

      Regards,

      Mike.

      #33373

      Ah but did they id Bolete? Looks possibly Xeocomoid – pore tubes splitting???

      #33374

      Three found this past week:

      The first I mistook for a Mycena, thinking maybe inclinata. Fortunately I bothered to take it home to check. I have found Hydropus scabripes a few times before, and it usually catches me out each time (H. trichoderma is another sp. that comes close to this).

      The second seems to be Tricholomopsis decora. It was ID’d as Plums & Custard (T. rutilans) in the field but the stipe is yellow and caps small (13-35mm). Not seen it before but then most records are from Scotland. The spores from a print seem rather small for either spp.!

      The last is Scleroderma bovista. I don’t take my camera out much, but this was in my garden! I don’t record it often, but it’s easy to mistake for one of the other Earth Balls (unless you check the spores).

      #33375
      adampembs
      Keymaster

        Great photo !

        #33376

        My comment seems to have been crossed with your post – should have gone to Adam’s post of Bolete Mould – sorry to say again but all black magic to me!

        #33377
        adampembs
        Keymaster

          marksteer wrote:

          Ah but did they id Bolete? Looks possibly Xeocomoid – pore tubes splitting???

          No, boletes need to be in good condition to ID. When species are split due to a trace of pink in cap, or pores concolourous with tubes.. etc its impossible. Unless someone comes up with a DNA test kit.

          #33378

          ‘Spock doodah’! Maybe in my lifetime but probably not!

          #33379

          Lancashire Lad wrote:

          Marasmius rotula – Collared Parachute: –

          Click on image to view at full size.
          [attachment=0]Marasmius rotula – Collared Parachute.jpg[/attachment]

          Regards,

          Mike.

          Hi Mike,

          Are there any similar species? I think I found this (or a similar species) on holiday in Wales, but I didn’t get a good photo as there was only one fruiting body at that time so I didn’t want to pull it out and it was in a very awkward position for photography.

          James

          #33380

          Hello James,

          There are several small species of Marasmius with dark stems that have a pale apex (eg: setosus and androsaceus are not uncommon).

          Some have ‘proper’ gills, others gills which are vein like. Some are restricted to dead leaves of certain species (eg: Ivy or Box).

          Only four have gills which are attached to a collar as in rotula:

          Curreyi has a reddish-brown cap. Limosus I don’t know (it grows in marshes & swamps). The one closest to rotula is bulliardii which, like rotula, usually grows in large troops. It is unusual in that the stems usually have side branches!

          #33381

          Thanks Roy

          That means mine is probably rotula, white cap, growing on dry terrain and no side branches.

          James

          #33382
          Lancashire Lad
          Moderator

            marksteer wrote:

            My comment seems to have been crossed with your post – should have gone to Adam’s post of Bolete Mould – sorry to say again but all black magic to me!

            Mark,

            When you click on a topic/thread, the post that you will generally be taken to, (unless you have cleared your cookies etc.) is the first one that was posted since you last looked at that thread – (i.e. It might not necessarily be the final post of the thread.

            So, when replying to a post, it’s always worth checking whether the post to which you are responding is the last one, or whether there are more posts beyond it.

            If it definitely is the final post, then you should be safe enough to make a standard reply. (Unless someone just happens to be responding to the same post at the same time, and they click “Submit” before you do!).

            However, if the post to which you are responding is not the last one of the topic. then it’s better to “Reply With Quote”, so there is no doubt about which particular post your response refers.

            To “Reply With Quote”, simply click on the “quotation marks” tab, located at top right hand corner of the post to which you are responding.

            That will open a reply window, with the text of that post included. (You can then edit most of that text out and just leave the first sentence or so, if the post was a long one, to avoid unnecessarily long reply).

            You then type your response immediately below the quoted text, and submit the finished reply as normal.

            When the reply appears on the forum, it will be much the same as this one, since I replied to your specific post using the “Reply With Quote” method just described.

            Regards,

            Mike.

            #33383

            Many thanks Mike. I think in the instance where I posted reply someone else posted as I was doing so!

            #33384
            adampembs
            Keymaster

              Boletus pulverulentus under oak. Impressive blue-ing on damaging.

              #33385
              adampembs
              Keymaster

                Lactarius plumbeus (aka L.turpis, The Ugly Milkcap)

                #33386

                Hi,

                I reckon that Ugly Milkcap – Lactarius plumbeus is one we would all be confident to name just on field characters. That’s one of the trickier questions to ask – when do we need to pick a sample for microscopic study?

                I spotted this magnificent toadstool on the Cromford Canal – there was no way I was going to pick it as loads of people were walking or cycling past and I think many of the would have appreciated it as adding to the wild landscape bordering the canal. I would have felt bad about removing it. So I try to use a mirror, or just stick my Fujifilm camera underneath and use macro setting and flash and shoot “blind”. I showed my mates the lovely pink gills on the image and they were stunned. As there were no conifers about I was happy to call this Pluteus cervinus (and more than happy not to have to search for clamp connectioons to check it wasn’t Pluteus pouzarianus). They weren’t so impressed by the blurry image to the left – but it was enough to show the jizz of this species.

                Spotted the next day was Agrocybe rivulosa on a great heap of stable manure to the South West Peak District. Once again, I think I collected enough data to identify this accurately – and left the colony undisturbed.”Take only pictures, leave just footprints” as Les says – if you possibly can.

                :D

                Cheers,

                Steve

              Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 960 total)
              • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
              Scroll to Top