Forums › Forums › Fungi ID requests (post here if you aren’t sure what type of fungus you’ve found) › Phloeomana
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 25, 2016 at 1:58 pm #30074
While looking for Encoelia on a local hazel coppice woodland I came across this Phloemana 😯 As some of you may know but I suspect most of you don’t this is the new name for a small group of Mycena round heimalis olida and speirea👿 .Phloemana speirea
[attachment=1]IMG_9128 (2).JPG[/attachment] [attachment=0]IMG_9127 (2).JPG[/attachment]
MalJanuary 25, 2016 at 3:38 pm #38000Flaxton wrote:While looking for Encoelia on a local hazel coppice woodland I came across this Phloemana
😯 As some of you may know but I suspect most of you don’t this is the new name for a small group of Mycena round heimalis olida and speirea👿 .Phloemana speirea
[attachment=1]IMG_9128 (2).JPG[/attachment] [attachment=0]IMG_9127 (2).JPG[/attachment]
MalWhen did that happen
😮 😯 I have enough trouble with the small white mycena types without even more confusion.
Just done a Google search and NIL results so guess it must be recent
John
January 25, 2016 at 6:19 pm #38001Wood Wanderer wrote:
When did that happen😮 😯 I have enough trouble with the small white mycena types without even more confusion.
Just done a Google search and NIL results so guess it must be recent
John
Try googling as per the spelling in the title of this thread i.e. Phloeomana.

Ken
January 25, 2016 at 7:10 pm #38002Ken Burgess wrote:Wood Wanderer wrote:
When did that happen😮 😯 I have enough trouble with the small white mycena types without even more confusion.
Just done a Google search and NIL results so guess it must be recent
John
Try googling as per the spelling in the title of this thread i.e. Phloeomana.

Ken
Ah that explains it …
January 25, 2016 at 7:21 pm #38003It is only the first time I have typed it 😳 Mal
January 25, 2016 at 7:58 pm #38004Oh no! January 25, 2016 at 9:11 pm #38005Mycenahas clearly been a heterogeneous genus (pun intended) in need of revision – “ Mycena rorida” was a clear candidate for starters. It’s interesting that Phloeomanahas been placed in a different family: .https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porotheleaceaehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porotheleaceae” class=”bbcode_url”> – paragraph starting “DNA studies . . . . ” is worth a quick look.http://www.mushroomexpert.com/mycenoid.htmlhttp://www.mushroomexpert.com/mycenoid.html” class=”bbcode_url”> Chris
January 29, 2016 at 2:34 pm #38006Whilst browsing I came across this that I thought was a basic but useful addition to this thread http://scmycoflora.org/genera/phloeomana/phloeomana-species.php John
January 29, 2016 at 3:28 pm #38007Wood Wanderer wrote:Whilst browsing I came across this that I thought was a basic but useful addition to this thread
http://scmycoflora.org/genera/phloeomana/phloeomana-species.php John
I love the start to that article, John:
.Approximately 1 species in Santa Cruz County🙄 🙄 Chris
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

