Forums › Forums › Fungi ID requests (post here if you aren’t sure what type of fungus you’ve found) › Woodland Mushroom Identification
Really struggling to find reference and ID anything more miscellaneous like these guys.
Anyone have any ideas?
It would help to know whether the fallen trunk upon which they are growing is deciduous or conifer.
From the general appearance, they have the looks of one of the TubariaT.confragosa
Regards.
Mike.
Could it be Honey Fungus?
No, looks quite wrong for honey fungus. What Mike said. Looks like a brown spored species. Was this found recently?
I think it could well be Galerina marginata, though Tubaria confragosa is also possible.
best, Andreas
Hi, and welcome to UK Fungi.
It would help to know whether the fallen trunk upon which they are growing is deciduous or conifer.
From the general appearance, they have the looks of one of the TubariaT.confragosa
Regards.
Mike.
Thanks Mike will check them out. It’s a deciduous log.
Could it be Honey Fungus?
No, looks quite wrong for honey fungus. What Mike said. Looks like a brown spored species. Was this found recently?
Yea found recently.
Norfolk, UK
Could it be Honey Fungus?
No, looks quite wrong for honey fungus. What Mike said. Looks like a brown spored species. Was this found recently?
Yea found recently.
Norfolk, UK
A spore print would help. Honey fungus would be white and Tubaria would be a dull brown.
Armillaria
Interesting that they were on deciduous wood.
Tubaria confragosaGalerina marginata
I’m still of the opinion that these do look like Tubaria
Regards,
Mike.
. . . . Do these photos really say Galerina or Tubaria to you? I still think it’s a puzzle.
I agree that it’s a puzzle – but I remain 100% confident that these aren’t Armillaria
You can see from their general appearance that the fruitbodies in Mossman’s photos are pretty much fully mature, You can also see from the top photo that they aren’t much bigger than his thumbnail.
At that sort of size any of the UK’s Armillaria
[attachment=0]Honey Fungus – Armillaria mellea.jpg
Regards,
Mike.
Can’t disagree. I’m not trying to push Armillaria as an ID, but neither Galerina nor Tubaria seem right either.
There are around 48 Galerina species, and 5 Tubaria species. The first step in any agaric ID is a spore print. 
I think one can be sure that this is a brown spored fungus. In the middle fruitbody the ring is beset with brown spore powder, at least it seems to me so.
So anyway, there are not many genera which share the following characters:
– cap and gills uniformely brown
– stipe with memranaceous ring zone
– stipe with with silky covering
– growing on wood
Tubaria wouldn’t have such a ring zone, except Tubaria confragosa. But this species doesn’t have a silky white stipe and occurs on coniferous wood or birch.
Pholiotina had come to my mind too, but there the ring is even more stable and moreover these species don’t occure on wood but on soil.
A Galerina from the marginata group is in my opinion the most likely answer, and all feature fit well. G. marginata does occure in Central Europe more often on decidous wood than on coniferous wood, and the fruitbodies on decidous wood always look somewhat stouter t(like yours!) than those from conifers.
Here a foto of galerina marginata from a pure beech forest, on rotten stem of Fagus – b.t.w. on the same stem also Kuehneromyces mutabilis occured at the same time …..
best regards,
Andreas
