Trochila ilicina (was Microscope for spore examination)

Forums › Forums › Ascomycetes › Trochila ilicina (was Microscope for spore examination)

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #29574

    Here’s a photo of Trochila ilicina, taken with the eye cam on ToupView, using an IKEA desk lamp as the illumination:

    Trochila ilicina (Holly Speckle) 25th July 2015 t3.jpg

    [attachment=0]Trochila ilicina (Holly Speckle) 25th July 2015 t3.jpg[/attachment]
    It’s a terrible photo, but that’s probably because it’s my first!!

    #35422

    Hi

    That doesn’t look quite right for Trochila ilicina; more likely a ‘coelomycete’ perhaps a Coleophoma. Checking the ‘innards’ would help . . . .

    regards

    Chris

    PS Trochila ilicina portrait here: http://www.ascofrance.com/search_recolte/3594” class=”bbcode_url”>http://www.ascofrance.com/search_recolte/3594

    #35423

    That’s strange…

    Have a look here: http://www.ispotnature.org/node/704000

    #35424
    adampembs
    Keymaster

      Check this page by Chris Johnson (a respected mycologist) – you can see distinct “eye-shaped” apothecia. To be honest, it looks different to both your fungus and the plate by Chris :?

      http://www.outerhebridesfungi.co.uk/species.php?id=363

      #35425

      adampembs wrote:

      Check this page by Chris Johnson (a respected mycologist) – you can see distinct “eye-shaped” apothecia. To be honest, it looks different to both your fungus and the plate by Chris :?

      http://www.outerhebridesfungi.co.uk/species.php?id=363


      OK . . . .

      now I have seen all three photo’s I agree, this looks like the very early stage of Trochila ilicina quite a while before the “lids” open; seeing a single apothecium misled me.

      I must have a word with Chris J. ;); Adam is quite correct, his fungus does indeed look different – it is Phacidium multivalve, another very common species on Ilex, probably the anamorph:

      Phacidium multivalve.jpg

      [attachment=0]Phacidium multivalve.jpg[/attachment](note the rod-shaped conidia)

      Cheers

      Chris

      PS This is not, of course, in any way intended to impugn Chris Johnson’s excellent website, which has many splendid images of Hebridean fungi, including many species without similar images on the Web. The portraits of mosses are of extremely high quality as well.

      #35426

      Hi Guys

      Just been tipped-off by Chris Y about your new forum – news filters through very slowly to the Outer Hebrides. I hope it’s a great success and wish all those involved the best of luck.

      Thanks for the nice comments regarding my website – pity it’s centred around getting one wrong 😳

      Out of action for 3 months while work is carried out on extending my study area but hope to be active again by mid-August.

      Regards, Chris

      #35427
      adampembs
      Keymaster

        Welcome to the forum Chris, sorry word didn’t get to you about the forum. I guess you weren’t on Lancashire Lad’s list! ;)

        I had no idea your ID was wrong, you never know with these plant diseases if it is a certain stage, or morph!

        #35428
        Lancashire Lad
        Moderator

          Hi Chris,

          Good to see that you’ve found the forum!

          As Adam has suggested, When WAB went kaput, I didn’t have any contact details for you, (along with quite a few others), so was unable to get the word out to everyone.

          Regards,

          Mike.

          #35429

          Hi Mike

          Much as I thought. Didn’t think I’d been black-listed (yet).

          Regards, Chris

          #35430
          adampembs
          Keymaster

            posts moved here as subject has changed…

            #35431

            Rather than people having to move to an external website here is the ‘portrait’ (fungi.org.uk gives a bigger image in any case – toggle F11 and it gets even bigger 😳 ):

            Trochila ilicina.jpg

            [attachment=0]Trochila ilicina.jpg[/attachment]note the pale olive-green contents of the paraphyses and marginal cells which give the exposed apothecia their characteristic colour. Also note how mounting in IKI (Lugol’s Iodine), while useful for showing positive or negative ascus tip reaction, destroys those paraphysis contents and also loses the distinctive guttules of the spores. This is why it is important, whenever one can, to first examine living material in water – Zotto Baral’s “Vital Taxonomy“: http://www.gbif-mycology.de/HostedSites/Baral/” class=”bbcode_url”>http://www.gbif-mycology.de/HostedSites/Baral/.

            Chris

          Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
          • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.