Rust on dock (Rumex)

Forums Forums Rusts, Smuts, and Mildews Rust on dock (Rumex)

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #29446
    adampembs
    Keymaster

      I’ve seen the spots on lots of dock leaves and finally found some with aecidia :)

      Not good on docks, didn’t know there were so many, assuming its R. obtusifolius. Spores from aecidia are quite irregular.

      Henderson “Rusts by host plant” has Uromyces rumicis as likely contender for R. obtusifolius, could it be anything else?

      P1010017.JPG

      [attachment=2]P1010017.JPG[/attachment]

      P1010019.JPG

      [attachment=1]P1010019.JPG[/attachment]

      P1100509.JPG

      [attachment=0]P1100509.JPG[/attachment]

      #34869

      adampembs wrote:

      I’ve seen the spots on lots of dock leaves and finally found some with aecidia :)

      Not good on docks, didn’t know there were so many, assuming its R. obtusifolius. Spores from aecidia are quite irregular.

      Henderson “Rusts by host plant” has Uromyces rumicis as likely contender for R. obtusifolius, could it be anything else?


      Hi Adam

      if you look again Henderson’s “Rusts by host plant” you’ll see that Uromyces rumicis only has stages II & III on Rumex and as you point out these sori are aecial. This is Puccinia phragmitis, which alternates with Phragmites – might there have been reeds nearby? It doesn’t look like R. obtusifolius but it’s not easy identifying docks from a portion of a leaf (and they can hybridise – fruits are often necessary to be 100% certain); in any case the exact identity of the host is irrelevant – it isn’t a sorrel and so must be Puccinia phragmitis.

      best wishes

      Chris

      #34870
      adampembs
      Keymaster

        Thanks Chris. I was assuming the 2nd stage was II, not realising it begins at 0. A bit confusing as the Romans didn’t have a number for 0 8-)

      Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
      • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.