Forums › Forums › Fungi ID requests (post here if you aren’t sure what type of fungus you’ve found) › Melanomma pulvis-pyrius?
would be quite untypical for M. p., which is smaller, doesn’t grows in such dense communities and doesn’t open usually by half perithecia.
This looks more like Ruzenia spermoides, but should be verified by microscopy (what will not be possible in such overaged collections usually … )
best regards,
Andreas
Mark
don’t spend to much efort in such an old collection – if you don’t see some spores in the first try, than rather throw it away than spoil more time for it ….
best regards,
Andreas
Diatrype bullataSalix
[attachment=0]Diabul03.jpg
I come across more dead perithecia than active ones. The best strategy is to cut transversely across any prospective collection in the field
Cheers
Chris
Mark
definitely right was Chris says.
Sometimes when it is important to identify nevertheless, I try one (ONE!) preparation of the empty “crust” because you may find single spores that have been sticking to the interior wall – but that makes only sense when you have a species which can be identified by a singel spore, or (like in this case) when you just want to check wether your macroscopic determnation is correct and you know beforehand how the spores should look like.
best regards,
Andreas
Ruzenia spermoides – thanks your suggestion Andreas!
Successfully found ‘live’ perithecia and able to extract ‘jelly’. Microscope work by Emma Williams Glamorgan Fungus Group revealed asci with ascospores – hyaline. When stained with Melzer’s showed up nicely. Ascospores allantoid musiform 20.6 -0 21.6 microns by 4.2 – 4.5 which corresponds to paper by R.Hilber and O.Hilber 2002. Moment of confusion when a very few ascospores similar to M.pulvis-pyrius appeared but put down to contamination from insects or other. Sorry no photos but I haven’t been able to resize.
Mark
