Brackets on Chestnut

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #29585

    Found on Chestnut (Horse or Sweet) in my local woods in Sussex. Hopefully spores not needed?

    DSCN5530.jpg

    [attachment=2]DSCN5530.jpg[/attachment]

    DSCN5532.jpg

    [attachment=1]DSCN5532.jpg[/attachment]

    DSCN5529.jpg

    [attachment=0]DSCN5529.jpg[/attachment]

    #35505

    Hi

    this is Daedalea quercina; generally (as the specific epithet would suggest) an oak specialist; but sweet chestnut often stands in as a surrogate oak – see: http://www.fieldmycology.net/FRDBI/FRDBIrecord.asp?strAssoc=Castanea+sativa&strName=Daedalea+quercina” class=”bbcode_url”>http://www.fieldmycology.net/FRDBI/FRDBIrecord.asp?strAssoc=Castanea+sativa&strName=Daedalea+quercina. It must have been Castanea – horse chestnut is in a completely unrelated family; and I don’t believe you can’t tell the difference!!! 😮

    cheers

    Chris

    #35506

    Hi Chris,

    Thanks for the identification. When I found it I did think the gills looked like Daedalea quercina, but I didn’t realise it wasn’t restricted to Oak. I have found it at this site, about half a kilometre away, on an Oak by the bank of a river.

    Can all brackets be identified without looking at spores or do some need spore examination to be identified reliably?

    Thanks again,

    James

    #35507
    Flaxton
    Participant

      Sorry James

      Although there are some that can be identified in the field there are far more that need extra work at home.

      Mal

      #35508
      adampembs
      Keymaster

        jimmymac2 wrote:


        Can all brackets be identified without looking at spores or do some need spore examination to be identified reliably?

        James

        If only microscopic examination of fungi was as simple as looking at spores..sigh :)

      Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
      • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.