Flaxton

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 427 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The year 2020 for fungi #43817
    Flaxton
    Participant

      Hi welcome to the forum. Lots of interesting finds. Keep up the good work and let us see the results.

      Mal

      in reply to: Compact/Portable cameras #36271
      Flaxton
      Participant

        Still with my TG4 and has been said not as good as an SLR/DSLR but even with a naff/lazy photographer like me ie no special setup and almost always without tripod I can get some acceptable results.

        Mal

        PC193657.JPG

        [attachment=0]PC193657.JPG[/attachment]

        in reply to: Help identifying this bracket fungus please #42998
        Flaxton
        Participant

          That final photo convinces me that it is G australe. It looks to show two years growth of tubes and there is no sterile layer between them as there would be for G applanatum.

          in reply to: Is this chicken of the woods? #43007
          Flaxton
          Participant

            No doubt.

            Mal

            in reply to: egghead mottlegill? #43010
            Flaxton
            Participant

              I think you are right. How big was it?

              in reply to: Unknown Fomes (?) Fungi- Found under dead birch tree #42938
              Flaxton
              Participant

                Fomes fomentarius again.

                Mal

                in reply to: Unknown Fomes (?) Fungi- Found on Beach #42937
                Flaxton
                Participant

                  Hi

                  Fomes fomentarius for me Horses Hoof Fungus.

                  in reply to: Searchable List of Accepted Common & Latin Names #38350
                  Flaxton
                  Participant

                    Lancashire Lad wrote:

                    >

                    Flaxton wrote:
                    . . . I think

                    > these are accepted English names rather than “common”

                    > Mal

                    >

                    > Hi Mal,

                    >

                    > You will note, if you have a look at my screengrab some six posts above,

                    > that I do use “Accepted English Name” on the column header, as

                    > that is what BMS use at the head of their version of the list.

                    >

                    > When people refer to fungi by these names (especially beginners, people who

                    > are not familiar with fungi, and when used in informal foraying

                    > situations), most will ask “does it have a common name?” rather

                    > than “does it have an English name?”.

                    >

                    > So for me, “accepted common name”, “accepted English

                    > name” or “accepted English language name” all mean the same

                    > thing.

                    > Regardless of which phrase is used, it is the use of the word

                    > “accepted” which signifies that the name in question is

                    > officially recognised.

                    >

                    > If we want to split hairs, the BMS page itself, is worded thus: –

                    > QUOTE “A working party formed in 2005 after the publication of the

                    > Checklist of the British and Irish Basidiomycota has been increasing the

                    > number of common English language names for our fungi”. ;)

                    >

                    > To split even more hairs – my use (in posts on this thread) of “Latin

                    > names” isn’t strictly correct, because some fungi names aren’t derived

                    > from Latin. 😳

                    >

                    > More correctly, I should have used “Scientific names” – But

                    > again, when most people, and I include myself, (other than when in strictly

                    > mycological circles) discuss such things, they will usually say “this

                    > is a such and such, its Latin name is . . . “, rather than “its

                    > scientific name is . . . .”.

                    > (Although again, you will note that I do use “Scientific Name” as

                    > header on my searchable list).

                    >

                    > Regards,

                    > Mike.

                    Hi Mike

                    Just ignore me I was obviously having a bad day.

                    in reply to: Searchable List of Accepted Common & Latin Names #38345
                    Flaxton
                    Participant

                      Lancashire Lad wrote:

                      >

                      > (Currently, 1808 of the species so far recorded in Great Britain now have

                      > “accepted common names”).

                      >

                      > Regards,

                      > Mike.

                      I think these are accepted English names rather than “common”

                      Mal

                      in reply to: FRDBI #42736
                      Flaxton
                      Participant

                        When the FRDBI first started to have problems we (The Mid Yorkshire Fungus group) chose to enter all our records on to Cate. We had and still have every intention of entering them on the new FRDBI but not until we are able to do this as a group upload, I am not willing to put the in the work to enter all records individually twice. Having said that one of our members was also denied access to the details of some records on Cate ā€œbecause he was not a recorderā€. As I am the only member of our group who is that ā€œbone fideā€ recorder I am the only one who has access. That person is no longer a member of the FCT. Not the best way to enroll new and keep old members.

                        Flaxton
                        Participant

                          Great photos as ever Chris.

                          in reply to: ID needed please #42701
                          Flaxton
                          Participant

                            Hi Warren

                            Welcome to the forum. This looks like the stem of a Boletus (edulis?) with the head missing.

                            Mal

                            in reply to: Patch of Amantia? Plus something that has me confused #42660
                            Flaxton
                            Participant

                              Like Adam I don’t class myself as a proper expert I have only got 35 years experience šŸ˜‰

                              Once you have seen a few Blushers you rarely need to disturb them. There is normally some reddening on the fruit body especially where it has been damaged/eaten. If you cut the fruit body in half it should turn pink, that with ring and bulbous base gives you your id.

                              I think your last find is a weather affected Clouded Agaric. Strange shapes often occur at this time of year.

                              Mal

                              in reply to: Ball shaped fungi with lattice interior #42662
                              Flaxton
                              Participant

                                Hi Jane welcome to the forum.

                                It is one of the “stink horn” group. It may develop into a Phallus impudicus or even better as a White cage fungi Ileodictyon cibarium.. leave the second one to develop and update us as to what it turns in to.

                                Mal

                                in reply to: ID please beginner #42646
                                Flaxton
                                Participant

                                  Another comment. Your photos suggest you were worried about touching your finds. You cannot absorb any poison from touching so no need for the gloves in future.

                                Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 427 total)