UK Fungi

Potassium permanganate 3%

Forums › Forums › Technical Stuff › Microscopes, Cameras, Equipment, Technology › Potassium permanganate 3%

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 1, 2017 at 9:41 pm #30588
    Pitufo

      A quick share of a new staining technique I hadn’t come across before. Good for small hyaline spores.

      https://micro-science.co.uk/product/potassium-permanganate/

      Thank you to Claude Bayet for this suggestion.

      March 2, 2017 at 1:16 pm #39815
      Chris Yeates

        Hi

        Given that this is a stacked image, with what looks like DIC contrast it’s rather difficult to compare this with what most people would see using this technique.

        Certainly not as good as MLZ for Russula spores; that image does not show the ± complete reticulum one would expect with R. ochroleuca. Still, it’s horses for courses. It would be interesting to see the images taken with a standard light microscope; also shots of different micro-features – clamps for example . . .

        Chris

        March 2, 2017 at 6:49 pm #39816
        Pitufo

          The photo was only to show the colour of the spores.. Russula were the only hyaline ones I had handy.. It isn’t meant to replace Melzer’s. The technique was recommended for use with very small hyaline spores or strutures which are sometimes hard to see and measure. I guess it just oxidises organic matter brown.

          No real DIC involved – I just happened to be playing around last night with “Poor man’s DIC” – oblique lighting (or OL) ie a piece of card cut into a crescent shape placed on the field lens (cut from an A4 file divider in 10 seconds). It was my first attempt in a while and I was quite pleased with the results… See attached an unstacked image.

          More info on OL http://microscopy-uk.org.uk/dww/articles/oblique.htm

          and the more advanced COL http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/mag/indexmag.html?http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/mag/artdec02/pjcol.html

          Also a standard brightfield image.

          March 2, 2017 at 10:56 pm #39817
          Chris Yeates

            Too harsh on my part, for which I apologise (I have amended my previous post). I have found that when stacking mico-images they need a lot of re-touching (I use Zerene’s editing program a lot, but I am very – too? – fussy).

            It would be interesting to see the effect on other features like cheilocystidia and certain features of asco’s like paraphyses (distinguishing between those of Mollisia and those of Pyrenopeziza for example), and ascus bases (present or absence of croziers), etc.

            The Poor Man’s DIC seems very effective – fooled me at any rate 😳

            March 3, 2017 at 3:39 pm #39818
            Pitufo

              Thanks Chris. I will have a look at some paraphyses and post the results. PM me if you would like some solution for testing.

              I have been told that a 5% solution is good for visualising germ pores in basidiomycete spores which is something I have found difficult at times.

              John

            • Author
              Posts
            Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
            • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.