Forums › Forums › Technical Stuff › Microscopes, Cameras, Equipment, Technology › Microscope for spore examination
. . . . which would you say is better, a DigiCam or an SLR connector? The DigiCam costs more so we are wondering whether it is worth buying that instead of an SLR connector.
Check out what Mike says here:
What SLR do you have? (without live view it can be a hassle, and camera shake can be a problem – every movement is of course magnified!). If you are getting some sort of digicam make sure you get as high an MP rating as you can – while often a bit of a con with SLRs in this instance a higher MP value is critical. Also check out the sensor size – see http://www.gizmag.com/camera-sensor-size-guide/26684/http://www.gizmag.com/camera-sensor-size-guide/26684/
Do wait for advice from Mike(EDIT**)Good he’s already here
Chris
We spoke to Brunel directly and it is a trinocular which is brand new and hasn’t been put on the website yet. We have a Nikon SLR but I’m still considering whether to use that or the digicam. I think I’m going to follow your advice and get used to the microscope before moving on to photography.
It’s the SP40, which is so new that Brunel hasn’t even put it on the website yet! 4x – 100x oil and trinocular. LED not halogen.
We just tried out a slide – Gourd polen – and it looks great!
We went to see the MD of Brunel personally on our way to Wales and he was very helpful, we talked with him for 2 hours. We also gained lots of freebies: slides; coverslips; extra immersion oil; pipettes; prepared slides and those calibrating slide thingies. 


For non-agaric members of the basiomycota, Fungi of Switzerland volume 2 is the perfect companion, as it covers a whole swathe of basidios not in FN.
The first edition of FN had a disk with pdfs, so if you know anyone locally with a 1st edition, they could send you what you need.
The good old fashioned Collins guide won’t do then? 
Trochila ilicina
