Microscope for spore examination

Forums Forums Technical Stuff Microscopes, Cameras, Equipment, Technology Microscope for spore examination

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 9 posts - 31 through 39 (of 39 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #34703

    jimmymac2 wrote:

    . . . . which would you say is better, a DigiCam or an SLR connector? The DigiCam costs more so we are wondering whether it is worth buying that instead of an SLR connector.


    Check out what Mike says here: http://www.fungi.org.uk/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=221

    What SLR do you have? (without live view it can be a hassle, and camera shake can be a problem – every movement is of course magnified!). If you are getting some sort of digicam make sure you get as high an MP rating as you can – while often a bit of a con with SLRs in this instance a higher MP value is critical. Also check out the sensor size – see http://www.gizmag.com/camera-sensor-size-guide/26684/” class=”bbcode_url”>http://www.gizmag.com/camera-sensor-size-guide/26684/ note the difference between a full-frame DSLR and what – I think – tends to be the standard for down-the camera-tube-of-a-‘scope cameras, the two lighter blue rectangles in that graphic.

    Do wait for advice from Mike (EDIT**) as he has more experience of Digicams than me Good he’s already here. I wouldn’t use anything under 9MP, but I appreciate money can be a limiting factor. I would point you at microscope images on websites that I think suffer from poor resolution, but that wouldn’t be fair on the mycologists involved (none on this forum I hasten to add!).

    Chris

    Edit* If it is a trinocular (and I share Mike’s doubts re that) try and swing a deal to replace the x4 objective with a x60 – it may cost a little more but much much much more useful!!! EDIT** By Lancashire Lad – See my previous post, which crossed with this one of Chris’s, at bottom of previous page.

    #34704

    Thanks very much!

    We spoke to Brunel directly and it is a trinocular which is brand new and hasn’t been put on the website yet. We have a Nikon SLR but I’m still considering whether to use that or the digicam. I think I’m going to follow your advice and get used to the microscope before moving on to photography.

    #34705

    I got the microscope! (“Finally!” You are probably thinking 🙄)

    It’s the SP40, which is so new that Brunel hasn’t even put it on the website yet! 4x – 100x oil and trinocular. LED not halogen.

    We just tried out a slide – Gourd polen – and it looks great!

    We went to see the MD of Brunel personally on our way to Wales and he was very helpful, we talked with him for 2 hours. We also gained lots of freebies: slides; coverslips; extra immersion oil; pipettes; prepared slides and those calibrating slide thingies. :D

    #34706
    adampembs
    Keymaster

      Where’s the cake emote? Congrats! Now for the expensive part… the literature :D

      #34707

      What sort of literature… :?

      #34708

      Six volumes of Fungi of Switzerland at c£100 each, Funga Nordica £90 when in print Mycena D’Europe £120 ……….

      #34709
      adampembs
      Keymaster

        Funga Nordica (FN)is the “standard work” for Agarics (cap & stem fungi) Unfortunately, it is out of print and the new edition not out until 2017.

        For non-agaric members of the basiomycota, Fungi of Switzerland volume 2 is the perfect companion, as it covers a whole swathe of basidios not in FN.

        The first edition of FN had a disk with pdfs, so if you know anyone locally with a 1st edition, they could send you what you need.

        #34710

        Wow, that is a lot of money!

        The good old fashioned Collins guide won’t do then? ;)

        #34711
        adampembs
        Keymaster

          The subsequent replies to this have been moved to the Ascomycetes forum (under Trochila ilicina)

        Viewing 9 posts - 31 through 39 (of 39 total)
        • The topic ‘Microscope for spore examination’ is closed to new replies.