Forums › Forums › Fungi ID requests (post here if you aren’t sure what type of fungus you’ve found) › Puffballs/Earthballs growing out of tarmac
If I have to work it out myself, then I guess I’ll never know what this is. I’ve looked in Phillips but couldn’t find a match, which is why I put it on here. 
Sticking my oar in as no expert but try lycoperdon umbrinum – Google images. I was looking through to try and ID recently and some of these look like your photo. I do know that Google images are unreliable but it might give you a lead.
Thanks Nelly. I’m not sure that mine are spiny enough to be this species though. There was another clump, which was completely spineless. The gleba – if that’s what it’s called – seems to be yellow in some photos though, whereas mine was white.
Mike – let me try again.
I found these, they were growing out of mossy covered tarmac path in a deciduous wood with Beech/Oak/Birch nearby, but I couldn’t see if they were actually growing from wood. The biggest one was about approx 6cm across. They had what looked like clumps of spines rather than scales, but they are not like anything I’ve seen before and I can’t find anything like them in my fungi book. They are just a few houses down the road so easily accessible if I need to look at a specific characteristic and I’m hoping that someone can point me in the right direction.
Don’t you dare suggest I’m from Yorkshire.
Oops, not from Lancashire are you? (you haven’t filled in your profile!) 
When in a hole, keep on digging .. 
:

L perlatum tends to have a distinct stem and expanded top part. It also has obvious pyramidal spines. L pyriforme is pear shaped as per the name. Calvatia excipuliformis is rather large. L echinatum has prominant spines. L umbrinum has smaller spines but they are obvious, and seem to occur in little clumps or four or so, from memory. L nigrescens is similar, L molle less spiney. So I think we can say it is one of the last three. The spines seem few, and small, and it does not look as they have fallen off – they would leave marks – so as suggested above, L molle is most likely.
James, this is all about paying attention to details, and pattern recognition. Perhaps your problem is lack of decent literature, although you need to know how to use it. Many popular guides if not almost all, are rather vague, and trying to ID species even with a venerable guide such as Phillips is often unrealistic. There are some excellent web sites, sich as bioimages, with quality photos, and I suspect the ID is usually if not always reliable.
Oh, and you need good specimens, preferably young and mature, AND PLEASE MAKE NOTES AT THE TIME OF COLECTION. I use an Amazon Fire tablet. I can copy a word file to my PC in seconds.
Finally, THIS IS NOT EASY. It needs patience, and learning. It once took me five years to ID a collection. Many times I do not reach an ID. Of course you can just enjoy seeing the many various and beautiful forms without putting names to them.
“Start small: learn to recognise the basic groups where possible, that is half the battle. Go on as many guided mushroom walks as possible and learn from experts in the field – there is no substitute for that. Field guides can only take you so far and cannot show you all the many variations that fungi are capable of. My favourite saying is that ‘mushrooms don’t read the books!’ Meaning that they don’t always conform in size and appearance to the illustrations in the book, they vary enormously as they age”.

