Compact/Portable cameras

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 43 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #36255
    adampembs
    Keymaster

      Wood Wanderer wrote:

      Having seen a number of the finished plates all I can say is it is worth all the effort, simply first class Chris..

      John

      Agreed. Can I have a signed copy when the book comes out ;)

      #36256

      Chris is going to need a big print run just for his “friends”;)

      Mla

      #36257

      Flaxton wrote:

      Chris is going to need a big print run just for his “friends”;)

      Mla

      So in awe you are having trouble spelling your own name … 😆 😆 😆

      John

      #36258

      Fingers working faster than the brain.

      Mal

      #36259
      adampembs
      Keymaster

        Camera came, and the tripod is quite solid, but can be pretty low.

        P1010769.JPG

        [attachment=5]P1010769.JPG[/attachment]

        Some images I took today. Some are even in focus! Lots of settings…and lots to learn!

        #36260

        Adam that looks to be a good set of photos from the new set up. Still a bit big for a pocket camera but enjoy and keep posting for others to enjoy.

        Mal

        #36261
        adampembs
        Keymaster

          In retrospect, I am regretting buying the HS10. While it is a decent camera, it is hardly a compact, being quite bulky and heavy to carry around the neck.

          I also find the controls overwhelming, it offers a lot of flexibility and fine controls, but this means taking a photo is not a case of point and click. First, in automatic mode, it doesn’t save the preference for macro mode, you have to set it every time. I should probably use a custom mode for this, but would probably forget about it later. I also find the auto-focus isn’t reliable in low light conditions, and manually focussing is another time consuming thing, that I find difficult as my eyes are not so good, to see the focussing on the screen.

          My main dislike though is for long walks/forays, I no longer take it, as it is too heavy, and has to go in a backpack to avoid neckstrain. My old LX5 fitted comfortably in the pocket of my fleece and I found the photos it took were good and easy to obtain. In the hands of a skilled photographer like Mike, the HS10 gives outstanding results, but for a simpleton like me, it’s overcomplicated :(

          #36262
          adampembs
          Keymaster

            Well I’m thinking of getting a portable compact camera and the TG4 was recommended earlier in the topic. This was 3 years ago, so I dont know if there are any “new kids on the block” wrt cameras. Are there any publications that do camera reviews that focus on the criteria important for fungi enthusiasts? ie dark, damp conditions, and macro capability? I stopped subscribing to the FCS and the BMS is quite pricey. Do any of their magazines do camera reviews?

            #36263

            Hi Adam

            I use the Olympus TG4 with excellent results. I opted for this camera because of its underwater facility (I also record marine and freshwater algae). I restrict its use, however, to long treks or difficult terrain such as slippery seaweed-covered rocks. Otherwise I prefer to carry my DSLR and tripod.

            Regards, Chris

            #36264

            Hi Adam

            I have a TG4 and I get a lot of good but not great photos. As a compact I think it is excellent it is just thrown in my rucksack or pocket and gives lots of convenience when out foraying. In no way would I class myself as a photographer but like to record what I see for my own information and sometimes to show others and this camera does this really well. It gives you the opportunity to take close up photos with or without stacking and without all the paraphernalia that goes with a “real” camera.

            A couple of examples one using the cameras own stacking software.

            P6270542.JPG

            [attachment=1]P6270542.JPG[/attachment]

            P7020604 (2).JPG

            [attachment=0]P7020604 (2).JPG[/attachment]

            #36265

            Adam

            One thing that someone pointed out to me which I hadn’t noticed 😳 is the dreaded Purple Spot. Under full zoom on the microscope settings you can get a pale purple circle in the centre of the photo.

            P6070417.JPG

            [attachment=0]P6070417.JPG[/attachment]

            #36266
            adampembs
            Keymaster

              Ok, thanks guys. Looking online, I think the TG4 has been dropped and replaced with the TG5.

              £375 is a lot though for a clumsy fool like me. 😳

              #36267

              Flaxton wrote:


              Adam

              One thing that someone pointed out to me which I hadn’t noticed 😳 is the dreaded Purple Spot. Under full zoom on the microscope settings you can get a pale purple circle in the centre of the photo.

              P6070417.JPG


              Just for anyone’s info Who read’s this, the blue spot is also in the TG-5.

              #36268

              Thanks for the update. Still a pretty good camera for rough treatment and very often good results

              #36269
              adampembs
              Keymaster

                Yes, I quite like the TG-5. Not noticed that spot, sometimes a bit difficult with the autofocus but I tend to find that with all cameras.

              Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 43 total)
              • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.