Perithecia 0.1-0.2mm diameter, spores becoming brown with age 1-septate 15-17(-20) x (3.5-)4-4.5(-5) µm. Pseudoparaphyses (?) visible left side of first two micrographs.
[attachment=4]Anisomeridium viridescens Q 240719 008.jpg
[attachment=3]Anisomeridium viridescens Q 240719 009.jpg
[attachment=2]Anisomeridium viridescens Q 240719-1.jpg
[attachment=1]Anisomeridium viridescens Q 240719-5 pseudoparaphyses q.jpg
[attachment=0]Anisomeridium viridescens Q 240719-9.jpg
[attachment=2]w Anisomeridium viridescens 2 240719-10b.jpg
Macroconidia
[attachment=1]w Anisomeridium viridescens 2 240719-4 con.jpg
[attachment=0]w Anisomeridium viridescens 2 240719-3 con.jpg
In his monograph on pyrenocarps, Alan Orange wrote that the clearest character distinguishing between Anisomeridium viridescensArthopyrenia carneobrunneola
Not sure what mount you used for your slides, but perhaps mounting in K might help if you haven’t yet tried it? I think the thallus of A. carneobrunneolaA. viridescens
Best regards,
Anthony
The lack of an obvious K+ green reaction in my first section concerned me so I was relieved to find both perithecia and pycnidia in the second section as macroconidia aren’t mentioned for Arthopyrenia carneobrunneola.
I checked the LGBI3 descriptions for both Anisomeridium viridescens and Arthopyrenia carneobrunneola and though the K reaction and presence/absence of pycnidia are the most obvious differences there is also a slight difference in the spore shape:
A. viridescens “usually constricted at the septum; the upper cell usually distinctly wider than the lower”
A. carneobrunneola “not or only slightly constricted at the median or somewhat supramedian septum”
Though some of the spores in my sections are a bit intermediate they do compare better with Mark Powells’s illustration of Anisomeridium viridescens here:
than with the Asco France photographs of Arthopyrenia carneobrunneola here:
Jenny
Naetrocymbe carneobrunneola
Neil
Anisomeridium viridescens
[attachment=2]2024-08-03-05.jpg
Cross section of perithecia in water
[attachment=1]2024-08-03-06.jpg
Cross section of perithecia in K
[attachment=0]2024-08-03-07.jpg
Spores
Seeing it to day reminded me that the thallus on your specimen looks far to well developed for Anisomeridium viridescens
Neil
Photograph below shows where both the first and second group of micrographs were from (the second with both spores and macroconidia).
[attachment=0]zz Anisomeridium viridescens Q 240719 008.jpg
Anisomeridium polypori
All the best
Neil
