[attachment=2]IMG_7781.jpg
There are black perithecia (and perhaps some pycnidia?) on top of the host, about 0.1 to 0.3 mm diameter. The spores are dark brown, and almost all are 3-septate. Found abundantly on concrete paving (wall tops) in a rural Warwickshire garden. mm squares
[attachment=8]IMG_7741-1.jpg
[attachment=7]IMG_7742-1.jpg
In the Facebook group, Paul Diederich responded “probably Phaeospora lecanorae. Measure the spores to be sure.”
Abuot 20 spores averaged c 14.5 um (12.5-16) x 6.5 (5.5-7). The length matches the Phaeospora lecanorae description in this paper online, although some are slightly wider.
[attachment=6]IMG_5731.jpg
This reference is from “New lichenized and lichenicolous fungi for the Crimean peninsula (Ukraine)” October 2007. It refers to the host being Lecanora dispersa agg. (Was L albescens included then?) Spore size is quoted as 12.5-16 x 5.5-6 um.
[attachment=5]IMG_7755-1.jpg
[attachment=4]IMG_7759-1.jpg
[attachment=3]20230309211854280.jpg
[attachment=1]0026.jpg
[attachment=0]Screen Shot 2023-03-10 at 19.34.43.png
Phaeospora lecanoraeLecanora dispersaMyriolecisLecanoraMyriolecisLecanoraMyriolecis
As far as I can tell this hasn’t been reported for GBI before, so it would be useful to send this info on to Brian Coppins (and also a specimen if you have sufficient).
Best wishes
Paul
Phaeospora lecanoraeP. lecanorae
In this twitter thread I explain how my confidence was boosted in my suspicion of Acarospora versicolor
It is not a total disaster if a taxon gets added to the British list and we subsequently find out it is something else. It has happened many times before. As just one example British material of Caloplaca marmorataC. lacteaPhaeospora lecanoraeP. lecanorae
If you need any further help with this, do contact Paul or me as it is well worth pursuing.
Mark
Cladosporium licheniphilum
Again it was a suggestion by Paul Diederich, and from memory a less definite endorsement by him than for the PhaeosporalecanoraeXanthoria parietinaX. parietina
Phaeospora lecanorae
I’m not sure that my ‘book’ will ever be finished, nor published, but work continues and the short introduction stresses the value of studying the lichens close to home:
‘New’ species are perhaps less important than knowing more detail about familiar species really, and the encouragement to look closely, and all the remote-tutoring via Twitter on microscopy has been so valuable. Thank you
Yes, completely agree with your comments (and find Twitter thoroughly frustrating) – all Marks information and posts collected into a website would be an incredibly useful resource!
