Peter Roberts

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 61 through 63 (of 63 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Exidiopsis calcea query #40943

    PS I’m reading the wrong date. Less than three years late! Pretty good for me…

    in reply to: Exidiopsis calcea query #40942

    Just came across this – only six years late! The genus Exidiopsis awaits a DNA-based revision and is a bit of a mystery at the moment. I suspect we have many more species in the UK than there are names currently available. On the continent “Exidiopsis calcea” is the name given to a species that grows on dead attached branches of conifers (largely spruce) – as illustrated in Fungi of Switzerland. I have seen it in Germany and elsewhere where it is conspicuous and probably common. I have never seen this taxon in the UK, where our “Exidiopsis calcea” grows on dead attached branches and twigs of deciduous trees and shrubs – usually decorticated. It seems fond of garden shrubs like buddleia and flowering currant and is common, but not so conspicuous. Which of these two represents Persoon’s original species is moot. Our “Exidiopsis calcea” is packed with fine mineral matter and tends to turn patchily brownish wih age – but there may well be more than one species involved, since spore size is rather variable and some collections have quite prominent cystidia-like elements in the hymenium. File it away as Exidiopsis cf. calcea until we know better – or just pretend you never saw it!

    in reply to: ID please #43761

    Not my speciality – but your photos certainly suggest a Tricholoma species in the matsutake group. Tricholoma murrillianum would be close, if you were in the American Rocky Mountains which is where T. murrillianum occurs. The southern European equivalent is, however, Tricholoma caligatum which I would suggest is your species. The newly described Tricholoma ilkkae, known from Spain, looks very similar, but is said to have slightly smaller spores.

Viewing 3 posts - 61 through 63 (of 63 total)