Pluijm

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hyperphyscia lucida? #46386

    Hi Jenny,

    I agree with Neil that the first two photos are not H. lucida, since the soralia are too neatly rounded. I think it could even be a wet Phaeophyscia orbicularis, there seems to be some space between the lobes and the bark (not glued upon), and I can spot some tiny rhizines? I am not sure about the third photo.

    Arno van der Pluijm

    in reply to: Hyperphyscia lucida #45910

    maxieput901 wrote:


    Hi Arno! Would you say the lobes turning up at the ends and the pale prothallus are the characteristic features to look out for?


    I always look for a combination of characters. In an ideal situation H. lucida has rather large dimensions, wide, very flat lobes with indeed sometimes upturned lobes, generally with a clear rim of transparent ‘glue’ surrounding the margins. The laminal soralia originate from pustules that are often situated on folds on the thallus. Hyperphyscia adglutinata can rarely (in shaded habitats?) also have somewhat upturned margins, but I have never seen this extensive borders of ‘glue’. The neat rounded, isolated crateriform soralia are typical for H. adglutinata. Less well developed forms of H. lucida can be difficult to separate. Naming from photos can also be tricky.

    in reply to: Hyperphyscia lucida #45907

    Hi John, I am not yet sure that the second specimen, from West Down is also H. lucida. On the particular photo from West Down you posted here, the thallus seems to have rather wide lobes, but it also shows discrete, crateriform soralia more characteristic for H. adglutinata.

    Arno van der Pluijm

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)