BeMushroomed
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
If you scroll down after selecting the following link, you may find some useful resources. It might take a bit of exploring. Quote:maybe I need another site for the former?
MushroomObserver.org is an excellent site for some slime molds. I’ll see if I can find another one that deals more directly with them, and try to follow-up with you later.
I need more photos of this species in order to even suggest a genus, let alone a species name. It looks quite rare. You might not like this answer, but I would actually recommend comparing your photographs to other images of the following genera: _Lepista_, _Clitocybe_, and _Cortinarius_. Good luck! You may benefit by skimming this article for genus names and species names, and then using Google Images for individual searches of those names. This could be a _Flammulina_ collection. Can you add separate close-up images of the gills, stems, and stem bases? Maybe even a spore print photo? It would be good to contrast this collection with the names _Gymnopus dryophilus_ and _Marasmius oreades_. Hope this helps. You might want to compare your collection here to Panaeolus papilionaceus. However, I see some taxomonic characteristics that point far from this name. I just corresponded with one of the admins. He said the registration requirement is now removed. Can you confirm if those links now work? Hi There. Yes, I firmly agree and appreciate your comments. Unfortunately, Mushroom Observer is a popular international website with too much traffic. The admins were forced to require registration a few months ago to prevent bots, DOS attacks, and possibly unusual traffic that may be occurring by government owned computers. In order to fix this, MO, which is a non-profit organization, needs to raise funds to support additional users and data. I donated hundreds of euros a few years ago, and others have donated, but we need at least a few thousand euro to get things moving in the right direction. If you have any tips, I will be eagerly reading your comments. Cheers! For the identification of Amanitaspecies, visit: http://www.amanitaceae.org/http://www.amanitaceae.org/” class=”bbcode_url”> Looks like a “Rosecomb”: https://mushroomobserver.org/glossary_terms/1535 More:https://mushroomobserver.org/species_list/show_species_list/401 Cheers!
It’s not Psathyrella. The photographer should contrast that collection with Google images of Coprinellus micaceusand Coprinellus disseminatus. It might be helpful to continue to watch this species grow larger over the next few months. Try contrasting your collection with the genera Fomes and Fomitopsis. Awesome. Thank you for fixing this. I’d like to mention something else. I have been working for over three years to develop a non-profit glossary for Mushroom Observer. It’s available here, but it’s not even close to being finished: https://mushroomobserver.org/glossary_terms This is an advanced mycology glossary that needs to be further developed.
I was wondering if your community could *peer review* this glossary, and add comments in a post on this site. If you’re open to the idea, please let me know, and I’ll create a post somewhere.
-
AuthorPosts
